Friday, 28 March 2025

Thames Water: inside the crisis

 

Greetings!

 

Did I waste two hours of my life watching the BBC documentary Thames Water: inside the crisis? Well, not exactly because I managed to waste a quarter of that time doing battle with the Dominos pizza home delivery app. Normally such technological infractions drive me to despair but that particular website detour provided a welcome distraction from the tedium and less than insightful nature of the show. But enough of the TV critic in me. What did the two part programme tell us about Thames Water and their part in river pollution?

 

My overwhelming sense was that the further you went down the Thames Water employee food chain the better the understanding of the issues and true cost of the company as a serial polluter. The CEO, Chris Weston, was a truly worthless individual who appeared to have only one set of clothes, grubby jeans and tatty polo shirt sometimes complemented by a naff gilet worn over the nine months of filming. If he was trying to save his £2.5m annual salary and £195K quarterly bonus for things other than clothes or a decent haircut the money was certainly not spent on improving his inspirational qualities, leadership skills or ability to divine exactly why his company was fast disappearing down the drain. 

 

 

 

Oh, how he and his hapless PR sidekick Caroline raged again Ofwat, the press, citizen scientists and just about anyone else who had the temerity to point out the manifest failings of Thames Water. Could Chris and Caroline not see the failings? Apparently not, which is in complete contrast to the boots on the ground, employees with 20-30 years service who ‘got’ the failing of the infrastructure, seemingly genuinely upset and frustrated at not being given the resources to make things right.

 

What also struck me early on was nearly every asset of Thames Water, be it a building, item of plant or facility was decrepit, rundown, ill cared for or simply just plain dirty. The only thing scruffier was the CEO himself. I think it talks volumes of the culture of Thames Water that everyone has to live in this maelstrom of decay when part of what is required to make incremental improvements is not money but leadership and attention to detail. It was telling that 26 year old Josh, star of the first episode as the site manager of a giant sewage facility in west London, was genuinely liked by his battle weary work force as he got his hands dirty trying to keep the show on the road. It was telling that two years into the job he left (the fifth to vacate the post in 8 years) heading for a new job, frying fan and fire anyone, at Southern Water.

 

My conclusion is that Thames Water, whilst obviously too big to fail is equally too big to succeed. Unless there is a CEO out there with Herculean ability a water company that stretches from the badlands of East London to the rarified  elite of the Cotswolds in the west, with 18 million customers in between, cannot be run as a single entity. The Thames might be the river that runs through it but that geographical link needs to be severed.

 

 

I am excited for the season ahead

 

As Fishing Breaks embarks on its 36th season I should by rights be a jaded misery; the truth is I have rarely been more excited.

 

Yes, we continue to be assailed by governments apparently incapable of the simple task of keeping rivers clean. However, maybe Mother Nature has heard my prayers, dowsing the chalk downlands with two years of record rainfall. The word full does really not do justice to the state of the chalkstreams that are running fast and clear with, somewhere in that giant chalk sponge, trillions of gallons of pure water held in geological readiness to keep the rivers supplied to the end of the season and well beyond.

 

Why am I excited? Well, to state the bleedin’ obvious we are nothing without water. It is the life blood that cleanses the river and stimulates the whole ecological totem from bugs the size of a speck to the oldest, wiliest fish in the river. Aside from river beds so bright you will need Polaroids to shield your eyes, the most visible benefit will be a spike the wild fish population on the back of clean spawning gravel and egg survival. 

 

 

Dawn at Kanara on the River Itchen

 

Are there any downsides? My only real black cloud is the lack of river weed ranunculus. Last year we were overrun whereas this year on those same stretches it is almost completely absent right now. I cannot offer you an easy explanation; normally lots of winter water equals lots of weed. But there is some research that indicates this water buttercup plant has a cyclical growth pattern peaking every sixth year. It will be back but on some beats not until midsummer.

 

Finally, if you are worried about bank conditions it is nothing like last year. If you recall some River Test catchment beats such as Middleton Estate and Upper Clatford were underwater in May and often treacherous on rivers elsewhere. Having walked both the aforementioned this week we have no such difficulties and will open in May as planned.

 

 

Above: Hatch Pool at Middleton Estate on the River Test Below: Mill Pond at Nether Wallop Mill

 

 

 

Fly Fishing Film Tour is back in town

 

For those of you with pre-Covid memories you might recall we hosted the Fly Fishing Film Tour as part of the One Fly Festival. Sadly, the One Fly is no more but I am delighted to say the Tour is back with screenings in England and Scotland.

 

The Tour kicks off with two screenings in Stockbridge 31/March, before heading to London 2/April at the Prince Charles cinema just off Leicester Square which has great memories as the place we held the the premiere of CHALK. After that, between 5-14/April, the FFFT takes in Penrith, Kelso, Glasgow, Bakewell and Manchester.

 

As ever, it will be lots of adrenaline and bending rods in many far flung and exotic locations as you will see from the trailer…. I am pleased to see word of the FFFT is deservedly spreading with screenings in 14 countries including cities such as Bangkok and Cape Town. My only slight niggle is that we lack British representation. Come on native film makers is there not a heart pumping story to be told of Scottish salmon or English brown trout?

 

Tickets are available for all shows here …… and drop into the Orvis Stockbridge store for a free beer

 

 

 

John Bailey reports from the River Wye

 

So, my second year with Fishing Break’s esteemed clients finished once the bell chimed midnight on March 14th and the coarse river season drew to its close. As ever, there’s a whole gamut of feelings. A tinge of relief, time to clean out the Land Rover, sort out the shed. Happiness at not setting the alarm. A wave of nostalgia at the thought of another year well lived and gone for good. Memories of friends made, methods explored, fish conquered. Some time to reflect on mistakes made but triumphs pulled off. Excitement over plans for 2025/26, God willing. New water to explore, new methods to perfect, new people to meet and old friends to enjoy.

 

Most of the season gone has been good news. We know all of us that the Wye has its issues and that were I just a salmon man again, then the future would be unutterably bleak. But the chub are bigger than the Wye has ever seen them, certainly in my experience and in any recorded history I can find. The barbel too. They are bigger, in wonderful condition and my suspicion is that a 14 pounder is soon to fall. The pike appear like monsters from a nightmare , we’ve seen them just under “thirty”, and four pound perch are almost but not quite everyday captures. So, for the most part it has been rod bending, reel screaming excitement. 

 

 

Spectacular River Wye perch

 

I’ve been happy to see the Wye cleaner and clearer these last few months than it has been for two years. My thoughts are that fly caught barbel might possibly be on the cards again come June/July. Bouncing baits should be thrillingly productive and I really want to get more trotting into our schedules. Hooking a barbel or big chub at fifty yards range really is as good a sensation as it gets. Touch ledgering is always a must experience but I have a yen for a little Tenkara fun as the summer warms up. I have plenty of plans, not least for the backend of next season. I have tended to draw barbel fishing to a slow halt as November draws on but if the river is a decent height and if the temperatures hold up, I’ve found this December and March that the fishing can be spectacularly good with fish glowing with health. Sessions are short but action packed and I’m planning to keep top beats ticking over next back end.

 

The diary for A Day on the River Wye with John Bailey is now open. For more information click here ….

 

 

 

Quiz

 

Back to the normal random collection of questions inspired by the events that took place on this date in history or topics in the Newsletter.

 

1)     Which Tory minister, later leader of the party, was in charge of water privatisation in 1989?

 

2)     Are perch classified as carnivores, herbivores, or omnivores?

 

3)     The Latin name Tamesis referred to what river?

 

Answers are at the bottom of this Newsletter.

 

Have a good weekend.



Best wishes,

 

 

Simon Cooper simon@fishingbreaks.co.uk

Founder & Managing Directorwww.fishingbreaks.co.uk

 

 

1)     Michael (now Lord) Howard

2)     Carnivores (meat eaters). The other fish classifications are herbivores (plant eaters) and omnivores (meat and plant-based foods).

3)     River Thames

Friday, 14 March 2025

Saving wild salmon: it is all about the money

 

Greetings!

 

Reading scientific research papers is not a great joy of mine though I will say from even the most mundane presentation I usually discover a new word or two. When will scientists ever learn that obscuring meanings does not help their cause? Regardless, from my latest homework read on your behalf, I came across the word ‘ploidy’. Yes, I had no idea and if you do, well go to the head of the class. It means, for the record, the number of sets of chromosomes in a cell, or in the cells of an organism.

 

You have guessed it, I was following up on the diploid vs. triploid salmon question that I posed last time, an expert reader helpfully sending me two links to relatively recent scientific research on the topic. The headlines are that it has and can be done, but mortality and cost are barriers.

 

 

The first research was into the egg production, when the ‘triploiding’ takes place. The conclusions were these two types of salmon [diploid and triploid] have distinct physical and biological characteristics, including differences in their hearts, brains, digestive systems and nutritional needs. Triploid salmon hatched earlier than diploid salmon and reached the halfway point of hatching significantly sooner. Unfortunately, triploid salmon also experienced a higher rate of mortality.

 

I will slightly sidetrack here; I have always assumed triploid and diploid brown trout differed very little beneath the skin, though the former are distinctly different looking fish to their natural counterparts. I can tell them apart at twenty paces. However, reading this research does make me question what I wrote last year about the triploid trout stocked in our rivers having no behaviour differences to their wild brothers. If their hearts, brains, digestive systems and their nutritional needs are different, surely there are knock on effects? But enough digression for now.

 

The bigger body of triploid salmon research comes from another study published in 2023 and updated this January of a 2020 cohort of 10 million salmon distributed between 16 Norwegian hatcheries reared until they reached harvest size. The report notes that triploid salmon offered up a different series of challenges to the farmers who, for the most part, coped admirably by changing handling regimes, timings and feeding patterns to raise the fish for the table. However, the conclusion gives us a good indication of why triploids are not the chosen ones, “Overall, the triploids were also inferior in their economic prospect for the farmer, compared to diploids they had lower product quality at harvest, required more feed per kg produced, and had a higher cumulative mortality by the time of harvest despite being harvested earlier and at lower weight.”

 

So, it is pretty clear, it is all about the money. To my view this means government and regulators have to look salmon producers and consumers in the eye to tell them to take a hit to save our wild salmon. As a nation our leaders seem plenty willing to take numerous such actions in the name of climate change. Surely saving our native salmon from extinction deserves the same?

 

 

The natural power of nature

 

Mother Nature is an amazing being; five years ago, I was here in the Grand Bahamas in the wake of Hurricane Dorian. The human cost was measured in lives lost. The economic in a swathe of destruction. The natural in the eradication of the mangrove swamps.

 

In the immediate aftermath the country looked like a lunar landscape the once green fringed islands and coast denuded as if a nuclear bomb has been detonated. There was much despair as mangroves are the lungs that breathe life into the coastal ecosystem. They cover thousands of square miles but they nearly all died within a few months of the hurricane because mangroves, once stripped of their leaves are unable to expel salt, thus slowly dying of saline poisoning from the water that once gave them life. There were all sorts of plans to ‘seed’ the coastline to bring life back but though a few well-meaning attempts were made it hardly touched the edges as I suspect that, rightly, the human and economic took precedence. 

 

 

Mangroves post Hurricane Dorian

 

However, we forget that as here today and gone tomorrow humans what happened due to Hurricane Dorian might be a once in a lifetime event for us but in the evolution of the Bahamian landscape it is just another happening repeating something that will have occurred many times before, albeit centuries or millennia ago.

 

Today, I am happy to report, things are looking up. Walter, our guide, who’s house was wiped out, has rebuilt it from the ground up with his own bare hands, funding it as he went, in between his full time guiding work moving in on Christmas Eve just past, a deadline rapidly accelerated at the insistence of his wife! Few people here have hurricane insurance which is ruinously expensive; put it in some sort of UK context you’d be looking at an annual premium of £15,000 plus for a modest home.

 

 

Guide Walter with some hints of green on the shoreline

 

Things are also looking up for the mangrove swamps where natural regeneration is gradually taking hold. Protected by the dead mangroves tiny little mangroves are sprouting, a green fuzz visible across the wasteland. Of course, it will be a full decade or more before we are anywhere near to being back to pre-hurricane times but it is at least a potent reminder of the resilience of Mother Nature.

 

 

Mangroves pre Hurricane Dorian

 

 

Taking aim at the wrong target

 

As I read the account of a recent meeting held by the Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP) group where a show of hands at the start and end of the meeting showed 100% of the audience in favour of renationalising the water industry, I was put in mind of two political quotes.

 

Firstly, Ronald Reagan who said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'” And Margaret Thatcher who said of the Labour MP’s who voted against their own government, precipitating its fall and her consequential 1979 election victory, “They are turkeys voting for Christmas.” Let me give you the main reasons why renationalising the water industry is such a terrible idea.

 

 

WASP show of hands

 

To start with, we already have nationalisation in its purest form in Northern Ireland where privatisation never happened and where river pollution is considerably worse than in mainland UK. In Wales there are not-for-profit water companies where the pollution record is on a par with their English counterparts. Add to that a study of the multiple different ownership models across Europe that concluded there was no correlation between pollution outcomes and ownership type.

 

Secondly, we do almost have de facto nationalisation through the regulatory structure provided by Ofwat. As a water company you are not free to set your own prices, build new facilities nor invest without the say so of Ofwat. And that is without even taking into account the planning system which positively discourages major infrastructure projects. Anyone for a reservoir? Privatisation was meant to unshackle the water industry from political oversight. Quite the reverse has happened with water companies effectively becoming state service providers of sewage treatment and water provision at below market cost.

 

Thirdly, even if we struck gold with a renationalised water industry that transformed sewage treatment, we would only be part of the way forward because, guess what, the farming industry is a far greater polluter of our rivers. Do we need to nationalise farming as well? Of course, that is absurd but logically if you consider the state can reform one polluter why not all polluters?

 

And finally, there is abstraction, something dear to my heart on the chalkstreams. Every year we lose dozens, probably hundreds of miles of river, as the headwaters are terminally sucked dry by the permanent lowering of the water table. Does anyone believe that a government led water industry is going to pass up free water instead of spending billions on new reservoirs, desalination plants and a national grid for water?

 

The final irony is the WASP meeting demographic: they are the Boomers (including myself) who have had the free ride from the 1989 privatisation - thirty six years of cheap water. And not only that but they have also probably indirectly benefitted from water company profits though a state or private pension.

 

The narrative is that water companies are owned by rapacious capitalists intent of fleecing the consumer, as sort of cross between Rupert Murdoch and Mr Burns of The Simpsons cartoon fame. The truth is more mundane. Water companies are for the most part either publicly traded where pension funds hold large tranches of stock or private companies where the primary investors are pension funds. One way or another those much reviled dividends have often found their way back into the bank accounts of the very people who put their hands up in favour of renationalisation. Maybe they are turkeys as well.

 

 

The bird that checked in but will never leave

 

I am sitting in an airport on a small sandy island, all blue glass and white steel, one of those much beloved of governments seduced by the shiny promise of PFI to build a facility for a third of a million passengers a year but with barely a quarter of that number ever likely to arrive.

 

To while away the time, we have been watching the antics of a little sparrow who seems to have made this aircraft hanger of a place his (or her maybe?) home. Perched high on a strut he has a perfect view of the dining area. Clearly attuned to the transitory nature of the clientele he waits for a table to be vacated, swooping down to take whatever leftovers take his fancy, all the time with an eye out for the wait staff, returning to his perch once they come to clear the table though they seem unbothered by his scavenging ways.

 

 

We are pretty well the last flight of the day which prompts my travelling companion to wonder what will happen to the bird when everyone goes home. Will he be locked in? Will he make it through the night without water? I am less convinced the sparrow is in mortal danger but my companion is less flinty hearted heading to the bar to buy a bottle of water and beg a saucer to victual the bird until the following day.

 

As it turns out the bird will indeed be locked in but by choice. According to the bartender everyone knows him as he simply refuses to leave. Other sparrows come and go through the automatic doors but our buddy chooses to stay, well into his second full year of residency, sustained each night by water and food left out on the bar. I have just looked it up – sparrows can live up 25 years in captivity away from the predations and depravations of life in the wild. My money is on him outlasting the airport he has made his home.

 

 

Quiz

 

Back to the normal random collection of questions inspired by the events that took place on this date in history or topics in the Newsletter.

 

1)       From which Shakespeare play is the quote, "There is special providence in the fall of a sparrow".

 

2)       Who wrote the philosophical fiction and gothic horror novel The Picture of Dorian Gray?  

 

3)       What do you call an animal with four sets of chromosomes? 

 

Answers are at the bottom of this Newsletter.

 

Have a good weekend.



Best wishes,

 

 

Simon Cooper simon@fishingbreaks.co.uk

Founder & Managing Directorwww.fishingbreaks.co.uk

 

 

1)       Hamlet

2)       Oscar Wilde

3)       A tetraploid