It has felt to me, for a while, that plans to deal with the problems of the water industry are in something of a holding pattern, so the press and repeat appointment of a new minister will do little to speed things along. After the Cunliffe Report, commissioned by Keir Starmer, which recommended a rewiring of regulation not very much has happened aside from various hints about renationalisation and the apparently eternal game of chicken as to the future of debt-stricken Thames Water.
Eagle has two choices but neither of them obviously good. The populist option is, of course, renationalisation but this is easy to say but hard to do. Realistically by the time she has put the legislation through parliament and fought a myriad of legal battles her time at Defra will be long past; indeed we will likely be into the next government and Eagle will be being measured for her ermine robes.
To not nationalise will run counter to the Burnham mood music and is, I suspect, counter to Eagle’s Corbynite tendencies. However, my suspicion is that, once briefed by civil servants they will understand that the issues with the water industry are not about who owns it but rather management, regulation and massive infrastructure spending. Moving the latter onto the government debt ledger is something, with many other pressing needs for cash, this government could well do without so anticipate a ‘reimagined’ Cunliffe Report on steroids with more stick than carrot as far as the water companies are concerned.
All this will be played out against the background of the Environment Agency’s (EA) latest six year data on the health of England's rivers, lakes, estuaries and groundwater published last week none of which is good. Nothing has improved since 2019, arguably things may be worse, with only 14.3% of England’s surface waters achieving good ecological status. Aside the EA’s continued whining about being forced to test to a higher standard than they would like (boo hoo!) it is interesting that they note comparable EU countries are recording far lower rates of good ecological status, including 8% in Germany and 1% in the Netherlands which exposes the fallacy that Europe, with a largely nationally owned water sector, has better river health than the UK.
I know it is not a popular line of thought but making the water companies the bad guys and driving them to destruction whilst hoping what comes next will, with a mighty leap, cure our problems is for the birds. As the EA say, “Many factors can affect the quality of rivers and other bodies of water – from sewage spills and agricultural nutrients to urban and transport surface water run-off, which can include litter, petrol and garden pesticides.” Even if there is a certain amount of deflection and self-interest in the statement, the EA are making a fair point – pollution sources are manifest and, even if we solved the water company issues overnight, we would only be one third of the way to a solution.
My hope is that the Water Ombudsman, proposed in the Cunliffe Report with little indication of exactly what its role might be, will be expanded with oversight of not just the water industry but everything that contributes to pollution from whoever or wherever it might originate.. |