Life of a Chalkstream: September 2019

Rules. What rules?

When I was growing up a troll was a mythical, gnarled looking creature that hid in a cave ready to leap out to scare unsuspecting passers-by. Parents deployed the fear of the troll to discourage us children from certain places. Such innocent times. Today trolls are a real thing. People who lurk in the recesses of the internet ready to pounce on actions or words that transgress or offend the moral code of the aforementioned troll.


	Ivan the Breckeridge troll

Brexit. Donald Trump. Climate change. 21^st century trolls have never had it so good so I guess it was inevitable that some would find their way into the fly fishing community.

Now you might suppose I am talking about those opposed to the whole concept of fishing. But no. This is blue-on-blue. One fly fisher trolling another. Lambasting, in strong and unpleasant language, an angler who committed the most heinous and unpardonable act - he used a weighted nymph under a strike indicator.

Always assuming they are conducted in the spirit of friendship, I always enjoy these debates about what methods are 'good' and which are 'bad', but it is worth first setting out exactly what the base line is. The law if you like. It is pretty sparse. On a national basis the only things that are specifically prohibited in England & Wales (there are additional regional by-laws) is using live crayfish as bait, anything other than an artificial lure or fly for salmon before 16 June and gaffs or tailers. The truth is if you own a river you can pretty well fish, and allow those who use it, to do so in the way of your choosing. The regulations set out by the Environment Agency largely revolve around close seasons and catch sizes. Where they rule on what's on the end of your line it is by way of local by-laws on bait, spinning and so on. The closest they veer into fly fishing territory is that salmon rule. When it comes to dry vs. nymph or dropper vs. not the law is clear: there is no law. It is, as the troll opined, about ethics or in the case of a strike indicator, unethical. But I'm not so sure.

We have to be clear about fly fishing; it is an entirely contrived activity. If you had to catch fish to survive using a fly rig (even with an indicator!) would be way down the list of preferred methods to keep you alive. Like most sports the rules such as they are, are part tradition, part practical and part pragmatic. But often there is little logic; we do it that way because we've always done it that way and we like it that way.

But in the absence of rules it is dangerous to be guided by, or judge on, the basis ethics. Mine may be very different to yours. As Voltaire said, "It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets."

Flying fishing

HUMAN LIFTING FISHING DRONE - WORLD FIRST

Drones and fishing have been happy companions for a few years now. Saltwater anglers use them to scope out expanses of sea. Adventurers spy up the river for miles ahead. Coarse anglers use them to go one better than bait boats. So, the next logical extension (!) is to suspend the angler beneath a drone.

It can't be done I hear you cry. But in Australia in can. And it has been done though the authorities are investigating whether it is both legal, a probably more importantly, safe.

What you can't deny is that it was, despite all the odds successful.

Watch and see.

Fly tying with Barry Ord Clarke

I don't know about you but for me where most how-to books fail is in the diagrams or photographs that don't quite demonstrate every stage of the process; one tiny missing fragment of knowledge defeating your attempts to learn a new cast, tie a knot or create an esoteric fly pattern. However, Barry Ord Clarke has come up with the answer in his just published The Feather Bender's Flytying Techniques.

Originally from Lancashire Barry is both a professional photographer and award-winning fly tyer who's flies are on display in the Fly Fishers' Club and even though I hazard you didn't even know it existed, the Catskill Fly Fishing Museum in the United States.

With a mission to explain Barry's book doesn't focus on flies to tie for the sake of tying but rather those we use day in, day out - the Klinkhamer, Pheasant Tail Nymph and Midge to name but three of his twenty-eight.

Naturally he has his own take on each, but in addition to the beautiful photographs Barry has enlisted modern technology. Use your mobile phone to scan the QR code on the relevant page and up will pop a video showing Barry tying that very pattern.

That said you can go one better to see Barry live on Thursday 7 November when he will be at the Orvis store in Stockbridge 3pm-7pm signing copies of his book, tying flies and ready to answer any questions you might have. More details here Barry's book is available on Amazon for £25.

The Quiz

This might well be out of date by the time you read this ....... as ever the quiz is just for fun, with answers at the bottom of the page.

1) What do the initials QR (as in QR code) stand for?

2) In which US state are the Catskill Mountains?

3) Who are the longest and shortest* serving British Prime Ministers of all time?

Have a good weekend.

Best wishes,

Simon Cooper simon@fishingbreaks.co.uk

Founder & Managing Director

www.fishingbreaks.co.uk

Answers:

1) Quick Response

2) New York State

3) Robert Walpole is the longest at 20 years starting in 1721. The shortest George Canning with 119 days in 1827. *Boris Johnson is currently on 65 days.

Have you heard about Bait? If you haven't you surely will soon. It is an unlikely film to capture the zeitgeist shot as it is in black and white, on a hand cranked camera with the sound - both dialogue and music - dubbed on afterwards.

Without giving too much away it is the story of a Cornish fishing village where the bait once used to lure fish is now the 'bait' to entice tourists. Most of the town has sold out both in terms of housing and employment but are mostly unhappy vassals to the incomers. There are almost too many good lines to pick from (some too obscene for here) but my absolute favourite is a girl on the bus who announces of one of the Londoners that, "He was so posh I thought he was speaking German."


	BAIT Official Trailer

You will have almost certainly have guessed by now that the film revolves around the conflict between locals and incomers, which in the case of Bait, ends very badly. As word of the film spreads (it only went on general release 30/August) it will, I am sure, add fuel to the fiery debate as to who has the right to buy where. But this debate will be almost entirely binary in nature: locals good, incomers bad as if we have arrived at this point all of a sudden. But the evolution of the English village is a far more complicated affair. Take Nether Wallop.

My village was largely in a state of stasis in the centuries running up to the 20th; it was not until just prior to the outbreak of WW1 that it began its evolution to how it is today. The local Lord who owned all the land and houses around these parts put his estate up for auction. Some of the larger houses were bought by what you might call the wealthy merchant class (often as unpopular at the Bait incomers), but the vast majority were farmhouses and tied farm cottages. In most cases the ownership simply went from the Lord to the new owners who were previously his farm tenants. The only other property owners in the village were those who provided goods and services to the locals: the miller, the baker, the butcher, the blacksmith and so on. And this was how it would pretty well stay for the next half a century with four social classes in rigid hierarchy: posh house owners, landowners, farm workers who lived in the houses provided by the farmer and the self-employed shop keepers/artisans.

The change to how to we stand today really started in the 1950's as the nature of agriculture changed and transportation links improved. Suddenly people had choices. A brand-new house in Basingstoke with a job in a modern factory or office? It was an easy choice. Villages were hollowed out. What was truly dreadful housing to start with was abandoned to become even worse. In my childhood I recall dozens of dilapidated cottages. My father even bought the one opposite our home as he couldn't bear to see it tumbling down. He did it up but barely broke even on the pittance he resold it for such was the lack of demand. Today it would probably command £400,000.

It might seem hard to believe now but in the 1950's, 1960's, and to a lesser extent the 1970's, there was a flight from the countryside; the rural idyll as depicted in the Saturday supplements simply did not exist. Countless cottages were demolished to make way for practical, and generally ugly, bungalows. Farmers would almost give away the houses that were no longer required for their ever-shrinking work force. But not everyone went. The four local farmers who currently own the bulk of the land around the village are true Wallopians. There are still people who were raised and currently live in the house in which they were born. But this group is tiny in its totality - no more than a couple of dozen of the seven hundred odd residents of Nether Wallop.

And therein lies the problem with the local vs. incomer debate. How do you define a local? Is it residency of twenty, thirty, forty or fifty years? Do you lose your place in the queue if you move away to join the Army or somesuch? Or isn't tenure enough. Do you have to be second or third generation with all your long-gone relatives laid out in the churchyard? And then there is added complication of good work vs. bad work. Tilling the soil is seen as worthy but servicing the needs of visitors or part-time residents is not. Somehow, we seem to have elevated the hard grind of physical labour, which was both dangerous and life shortening, to an epic endeavour. It might seem that way if you didn't have to do it but that flight from the countryside shows what those who had to do it found, when given half a chance, an escape route.

The English village is a dynamic reflection of Britain as a whole. It fluxes. It flows. People come, some stay but most, in time move on. But to pretend that there was ever a golden age of bucolic harmony is a fiction. Enjoy Bait. It is a great film. But like much great cinema is uses the vehicle of human conflict to tell a story which is fundamentally at odds with the way things truly are.

Dorian's destruction

I pricked up my ears when news of Hurricane Dorian's route across the Bahamas was first mooted. For the most part hurricanes are the storms that we fear most but expect least; metrology is an inexact science in the face of one of Mother Nature's most destructive forces. The predicted path of the storm would only have to deviate by ten or twenty miles to entirely miss these relatively small and generally sparsely populated islands.


	East End Lodge before Dorian

I have travelled many times to Grand Bahama. It is my favourite bone fishing destination. It is not a poor country by international standards. Wealth, measured by GDP is $31,000/head - ours in the UK is not that much further ahead at $39,000. But as you leave the thriving commercial centre of Freeport it doesn't feel that rich. The highway is well paved, but it's just single carriageway and is the only road heading east. Early on during the one hour drive there are plenty of good houses, the more recent built on stilts four foot above the ground. But the further you go the fewer the good ones become. The settlements, such as they are, are mostly collections of shacks, each surrounded by abandoned cars and boats.

Occasionally something comes upon you by surprise. The crossing of the azure blue sea canal dug north to south across the island in the 1970's in the belief that a huge marina and waterside development would follow. All that remains today are the weed strewn building plots and the decaying street layout. Or the giant oil storage silos, each of the dozen as large as St Pauls Cathedral with the dome lopped off, in the midst of a coconut tree clearing with the hugest of the huge supertankers moored at the end of a long jetty offloading their oil to supply the Caribbean via smaller ships.


	East End Lodge after Dorian

My driver told me this facility had recently changed hands for $600m; this was in 2014. I had no idea whether that was true; it seemed a lot for a few tanks in the middle of nowhere. I also wondered as to his veracity when I asked as to the explanation of the tide mark at chest height that was on every tree I saw for miles and miles. "Hurricane," he said "we all got flooded." It seemed incredible that so much land could be engulfed by so much sea. And then return to something near normality. But I now know it to be true.

I'm sorry to report for those of you who know East End Lodge on the far eastern tip of Grand Bahama that it has been all but destroyed. The photo at the top, taken in happier times, is of the owners Robert on the left and Cecil in the middle (this is a joint US/Bahamian venture) in front of the main lodge. It is now razed to the ground. What is left of it is the pile of damage just in front and to the right of the green building in the after photo.. The white sticks in the water are what are left of the quay. The roofless building the rod and gear room. It seems that by some small mercy that one of the accommodation bungalows has survived but precious little else. You can watch the short fly by video, with more photos, from which the above frame was taken here. Click through to the fourth photo which will start to play as a video. East End Lodge comes into view at the five second mark..

My heart goes out to them all at East End Lodge. Not only is the business shattered for now but their homes as well. Nearly everyone who works or has some association at the Lodge - and there are many - live in McLeans Town a few hundred yards away. The town fared no better. It is horrible. The photo below is stark in the truth. I wish them all well and promise to be on the first plane out when they reopen their doors as I know they will.

McLeans Town last week

That was August

Though we yinged and yanged between extreme heat and extreme downpours August turned out just fine. I am not exactly sure where we are in the overall rainfall for 2019 but I'm guessing we will end up in the somewhere around 8-10% below average.

The effect on the chalkstreams very much depends on where you are on each system. The top headwaters are very thin, the middle sections on the low side without it being critical but with astonishing clarity. The lower beats have rarely had such a fabulous year.

Well done to Peter Collins who fished at Upper Clatford on the River Anton; he comes out of the metaphoric hat first to collect a snood for the August feedback draw.