Is all progress good progress?
The bad
apple rarely falls far from the tree; I am born and bred Hampshire having lived
within the county boundary for the best part of three quarters of my life. It
is an unusual county in that it doesn't have a particular identity or purpose.
If it had a claim to fame it would be the county city of Winchester, once
capital of England and home to the cathedral that has seen, I think I am right
in saying, more crownings of our heads of state than any other.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Progress c. 1720. Longstock eel traps
|
If you
wound the clock back to my childhood Hampshire would be largely regarded as a
farming county, albeit one of the more progressive and profitable in Britain.
With good
communications to London and healthy populations in the major conurbations of
Basingstoke, Portsmouth and Southampton it has prospered.
But half a
century of prosperity is not without its problems. The boundary between urban
and rural has been blurred. Country lanes that were once leafy byways are now
commuter routes. Quaint market towns the hole in the doughnut of sprawling
development. Airline pilots use the River Itchen as a navigation aid as they
descend to Southampton 'International' Airport.
As I write
these words I feel guilty. Who am I to stand in the way of progress? Deny jobs
and homes to those who deserve them? But then I ask myself should we remain
mute to see destroyed those very things that drew people to our county in the
first place. Is there not a point at which we say stop? No further. Life is not
just about the practical but the beautiful. Protecting beauty, in all its
manifest forms - be it human, animal, nature or landscape - has to be one of
the given duties for our generation. Which brings me to The Wheelabrator.
I know it
sounds like the latest Dyson gardening gadget, but it is truly the most
unwholesome thing to be proposed for the Hampshire countryside in living
memory. A massive building on the banks of the River Test that would fit the
aforementioned Winchester Cathedral inside itself twice over. It sounds at
first glance a worthy project, a waste management plant that turns rubbish into
steam. What could be bad about that? Well, lots.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Progress c. 2020: Artist impression of The
Wheelabrator
|
To start
with it will create more CO2 emissions than it saves. The two
chimney stacks, 80m high, will spew out steam for the next 50 years , the
vapour, clean only to the extent of standards in which we will have little or
no say, settling on the surrounding countryside, which as moisture will find
its way into the rivers and food chain with all the cumulative effects that
will follow. As for the actual rubbish that feeds this monster it will arrive
from far and wide; Hampshire does not need the Wheelabrator as it already has
sufficient capacity to deal with its own waste.
But most of
all, at least for me, it is a water thing. There is no desalination plant or
reservoir that will quench the Wheelabrator's thirst, all 135,000 cubic metres
of pure chalkstream water drawn directly from the aquifers beneath. That number
might mean little but essentially it is like plonking 1,200 new homes on the
combined sources of the Test and its tributaries, the Anton, Dever and Pilhill
Brook. It will suck more life out of already hard-pressed rivers.
I know it
is all the rage to talk about saving the planet, the space into which the
Wheelabrator has squarely inserted its pitch. But you must ask the question: is
one transient gain worth the eternal damage?
EDITORS
NOTE:
If you
would like to know more about the Wheelabrator Harewood project this is the link to
the official company website. Bin the
Incinerator is the local alliance fighting the proposal. The Campaign to Protect Rural England have weighed
in with a succinct statement on the application.
The local
groups are well organised and committed but are in desperate need of funding to
employ field-leading experts to prepare submissions ahead of the December 12th
deadline. Give what you can to help the cause via the community crowdfunding website which is one quarter the
way to its £25,000 target.
Overwhelming
response to catch & release survey
When I say
overwhelming, I really do mean overwhelming; to date we have had over 700
responses. I think I may have made a tactical error (!) in giving you all
freedom to range wide and free with your replies which leaves me, joking aside,
with the huge task of collating them all.
However,
the initial headlines are that you are:
- Massively (95%) in
favour of catch and release
- On catch and keep
you are more divided by species. Half want to keep a salmon, one third a
grayling and three quarters a brown trout.
- Two thirds are in
favour of compulsory barbless hooks
- 90% believe catch
limits should be set by river owners/clubs rather than statutory bodies
As to how many fish it is
reasonable to release or keep in a day, I'm afraid I don't have the numbers
yet. This has been really quite contentious, with a huge diversity of beliefs.
It is going to take some serious midnight oil to collate the many hundreds of
differing opinions into something statistically meaningful.
But leave it with me; I will
release the results in the New Year.
In the meantime, thank you to you
all for your contributions and if you still haven't completed the survey, or
know someone who might like to, here is the link. The poll closes at midnight
on Monday.
Planning for 2020
Sometimes it is hard to wrap
our heads around a fishing season that is still, in truth, a full six months
away. That said over the years I have sort of become used to it; my 2020 season
started sometime around July.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Summer on the Test
|
For those of you familiar with our
booking process you'll know by now there is a certain system to it all as we
prepare the fishing diary for each individual beat before it finally goes
online January 1st. In getting there I have to take into account the
many, and often conflicting, requirements of weed cutting, general maintenance,
rest days, owner days, grandfathered-in dates and numerous other requirements.
Part of that chronological jigsaw
are season rods, those of you who choose to elect to fish the same fishery on a
regular basis.
For 2020 I have five choices: one
on the Itchen, three on the Test and back after an absence of a few years the
5x5 which is five days spread across the five months of the season on different
beats on different rivers with the chance to catch each of the major hatches. More
details here.
That was
October. A reel winner. Diane at 15
I am currently reading A
Farmer's Year written by Rider Haggard, he of King Solomon's
Mines and She fame. As well as being one of the
best-selling authors of the 19th century he was also a farmer and A
Farmer's Year traces the events on his Norfolk farms in 1898.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Diane with Andy Buckley on the River Dove
|
In it he writes of December:
"... even in my own day the English climate has changed very greatly - now
it is common for autumn to stretch up to Christmas, while winter prevails from
February to June."
I quote this not in the spirit of climate
change denial but by way of illustration as to the fickleness of our climate.
In recent years we have become accustomed to treating September and October as
extensions of August but lo and behold 2019 has turned all that on its head -
autumn trees have provided as much shelter as beauty.
Torrential rain has seen totals for
the month as much as double the normal amount for October, which followed a
September of a similar ilk. It might be grim for grayling fishing, but it is,
joyously, all water in the bank of aquifer for 2020.
Which, with the trout season now
officially closed leaves the one final duty to draw the winner from the
Feedback Forms of 2019. I am delighted to say that it is Matthew Ives who will
collect a magnificent Hardy Marquis reel having fished back in July at Wherwell
Priory.
Thanks also to Diane who made the
draw and congratulations to her as this month she celebrates (I think that is
the right word!) 15 years here at Fishing Breaks. A huge thanks from all of us.
Quiz
A fireworks and autumn theme. As
ever the quiz is just for fun, with answers at the bottom of the page.
1)
In
which year did Guy Fawkes attempt to blow up the Houses of Parliament?
2) The full
moon in October is called a Harvest Moon. What is the name for the full moon on
12th November?
3)
If
you were phonophobic what would you be scared of?
Have a good weekend.
Best wishes,
Simon Cooper simon@fishingbreaks.co.uk
Founder & Managing Director
Answers:
1)
1605
2)
Hunters
Moon so called as it allowed hunting at night when animals were scavenging
fields for the remnants of harvest.
3) Loud noises
No comments:
Post a Comment