Make mine a G&T
Is it safe to swim?
Nymph Fishing in Perspective
And the winner is ....
Summer fly selection
Quiz
|
|
It is
doubtful you have heard of the American writer and humourist
Garrison Keillor but you will certainly have heard him – he has,
for most of this century, been the voice of the long-running
Honda ‘Power of Dreams’ adverts.
|
|
As I
went in search of Hampshire’s newest craft gin distillery last
week I was put in mind of a quote by him, “You learn more about
the world by lying on the couch and drinking gin out of a bottle
than by watching the news.” It has been a long time since I did
that but, considering the current state of the world, it seemed
not such a bad idea. The recently minted River Test Distillery in
Longparish seemed an excellent place to obtain the raw material.
In the
past decade gin has gone from an also-ran in the alcohol stakes
to the go-go drink of choice. There has been an explosion in
craft gin distilleries, not least because, as the River Test
Distillery founders, Sarah and Jon Nelson, told me gin is not
actually that hard to make. In their case, first dig a borehole
deep into the chalk aquifer for the purest spring water which you
mix with 96% proof grain spirit in the proportions 160 litres
spirit/300 litres water. To this you add what they call the
botanicals – the stuff that gives gin its distinctive flavour:
juniper, coriander, bay, rosemary and such like. But every
distiller worth his or her salt has that special botanical. In
the case of Sarah and Jon it is the Meadowsweet herb that grows
in profusion in the water meadows.
|
|
You’ll
recognise it when you see it; it is a regular in July bankside
fringes, growing 4-5ft tall, the pale creamy flower heads
seemingly fragile, rather like baby lamb tails in appearance and,
if you care to go close, with a sweet smell. For Meadowsweet is a
member of rose family. So, in a few weeks’ time Sarah and Jon
will gather together friends and family for a mass Meadowsweet
pick, the flower heads then sundried, shredded and finally
powdered.
Suitably
infused the 460 litres goes into the still where it is boiled to
78C at which point the steam rises up the condensing column where
it pools into liquid, the gin coming off in three tranches:
heads, hearts and tails. The heads (about 5 litres) is waste the
consistency of nail polish. The tails (about 20 litres) is
undrinkable but suitable for a second distillation. The hearts
are the gin, about 120 litres of it at this point, but as yet
undrinkable at 78% proof. It requires an infusion of fresh spring
water from the aquifer to bring it down to a drinking proof of
43%. At this point most gins are bottled off and ready to ship
but not so River Test Gin. It will stand in the barrel for a full
month to let the chalk settle out and it really does make a huge
difference. I put my nose to the barrels of both new and
matured batches; the ‘column’ of flavours increased by I’d say a
factor of three in that month and the gin smells softer, the
individual botanicals coming through behind that sweet smell of
Meadowsweet.
I wish
Jon and Sarah every success in their new venture. The craft gin
market is a crowded one but they have already won Gin Of the Year
Award and with their distinctive bottle, with a cool glass and
wood stopper it is a bottle you’ll both want to own and give as a
gift. To visit The River Test Distillery or buy online visit www.rivertestdistillery.co.uk
|
|
Is it safe to swim?
I see
this week we had the virtual version of what should have been the
26th UN Climate Change Conference. Originally due to be held in
Glasgow later this year, the city will now host the gathering of
some 30,000 delegates in November 2021. I’m sure the irony of the
size of this gathering will be lost on nobody other than those
attending. No doubt NetJets surge pricing will kick in …….
|
|
However,
cynicism aside, we are trashing our planet. We all know that. But
where many of us part company with the UN panjandrums is whether
their grandiose global solutions will arrive fast enough to save
us from our own locally created problems.
Take
rainfall. We are told by none other than Sir James Bevan, chief
executive of the Environment Agency (EA), that Britain ‘is no
longer a wet and rainy country’. I’m guessing that the average
person would agree with this sentiment. But the facts speak to
something entirely different; there has been no significant
change in annual Britain rainfall during the lifetime of most of
you reading this. Average annual rainfall in the three decades
1971-2000 was 1,126mm. In the decades 1981-2010 it was 1,154mm.
Well, if the head of the EA, the man in charge of our water can’t
speak without reference to the facts, there is little hope for
rational debate.
So why
did he say it? My guess is that on the one hand he is saying what
he thinks people want to hear, whilst on the other he is
deflecting. Deflecting from the serious failure of the EA to come
to terms with providing sufficient domestic water supply for a
growing population whilst providing inadequate environmental
oversight of our rivers.
Wild swimming
might be all the rage, but would-be swimmers should pause before
they dive headlong into the water: a report in The Times last
year showed none of England’s rivers were safe to swim in. If you
log onto the Rivers Trust web site you can check out your
local English river; the map will tell you three things: the
sewer storm overflow spill duration measured in hours in the year
2018/19. Locations of domestic treated sewage discharge.
Locations of continuous treated sewage discharge. The advice from
the Rivers Trust is to “avoid entering the water immediately
downstream of these discharges, especially after it has been
raining.”
In
choosing to fight ‘climate change’ battle Bevan, the UN,
governments, NGOs and all the other not-for-profits who will rock
up at Glasgow are trying to frame the debate in terms that suit
them. They have simply shuffled such simple desires as
non-polluted water to the bottom of the pack. But the truth is we
should not let them. We should tell them what we want. When we
want it done by. And hold them to account to deliver.
|
|
Nymph fishing
Let’s be
honest, nymph fishing is still regarded by some as the bastard
child of fly fishing. At best a necessary evil. At worst a high
crime and misdemeanour. My view? Well, I simply love dry fly
fishing. Nothing in my life is ever more exciting than the moment
a trout breaks the surface to take a fly. Be it mine or the
natural I’m about to imitate.
But, to
a certain degree, dry fly fishing is easy. Rarely is pinpoint
accuracy required of the cast. The strike is easy, the fish often
as not hooking themselves. The hardest part of dry fly fishing is
not so much the fishing but the preparation: good tippet, good
fly care and good fly selection. Nymph fishing, on the other
hand, does require pinpoint accuracy and an incisive
strike. Frankly, I find it more difficult than dry fly
fishing. I have to concentrate more. Read the water better. Focus
harder on my target fish. My strike rate is in every respect,
lower with a nymph than a dry. The only good thing, on the chalkstreams
at least, is that the palette of patterns from which you have to
choose tends to be fewer.
However,
for all the skill required, nymph fishing still has the sense
that it is arriviste. The new kid on the block trying to upend
the natural order. Which, in truth, is not quite true. Which is
my favourite revelation from Terry Lawton’s new book Nymph
Fishing in Perspective. In the early chapters Terry has put
together a timeline which reveals writers were onto fish feeding
on underwater nymphs as early as 1600, with Japanese Samurai
warriors using flies with real (!) gold beads in 1650.
Astonishingly it was to be another 340 years before gold heads
caught on again when Dutch fly tyer Theo Bakelaar joined the
tying roadshow with his head and face spray-painted gold to
promote his patterns.
Which is
part of the reason why I like this book so much. Terry has
managed to combine the quirky with the technical, filling the
pages with tales of the often-flawed characters who have pushed
fly fishing to where it is today as often by accident as design.
Nymph Fishing in Perspective is available from book stores and Amazon at £15.99
|
|
And the winner is ....
We’ve
had it all this June from body-sapping heat to thunderstorms that
stripped roses of their petals. The countryside, I would say, is
2-3 weeks ahead of itself. I’ve rarely seen haymaking done so
early or golden barley ready for harvest. The fields around our
way look amazing with the pale pink of poppies and the blue of
linseed.
And
everything is so vivid green. It is a constant battle to keep
pace with the fast-growing bankside fringes and the weed cut, as
I wrote last time, was one that will live in the memory for a
while. The rivers have held up very well; it is only recently
that we started to see the flows fall back and I finally screwed
down the mill race to a trickle here at Nether Wallop around
midsummers day, something I’d have usually done in late April.
Amidst
all that our June winner from the feedback forms was Freddie
Lloyd-Jones who fished at Avon Springs. A bottle of River Test
Gin is on its way, as it will be for the July and August draw
winners.
|
|
Quiz
|
A
newsletter topic theme this week but as ever, it is all just
for fun with the answers at the bottom of the page.
1) Which
nation is credited with the invention of gin?
2) In
what year was the All England Wimbledon Tennis Championship
last cancelled?
3) What
is the origin of the name of the month of July?
|
|
|
|
Have a good weekend.
Best wishes,
|
|
Answers:
1) The
Dutch in the 1600’s
2) 1945
3) Originally
called Quintilis (Roman word for fifth) it was changed by Julius
Caesar in self-honour.
|
|
Time is
precious. Use it fishing
|
|
The Mill,
Heathman Street, Nether Wallop,
Stockbridge,
England SO20 8EW United Kingdom
01264
781988
www.fishingbreaks.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment