It was a shame we did not listen more
to people like Redford back then. I was struck by this thought reading a
piece in The Daily Telegraph on Tuesday charting the 82 per cent
decline of the British peregrine falcon population since 1970. The article
went to list the other birds in danger: turtle doves (99% decline),
capercaillie, wood warblers, willow tits, tree sparrows, spotted flycatcher,
redpoll, pied flycatcher and marsh tits are all on the same long list with
a suggestion that the rate of decline is accelerating the smaller the
populations become.
Why, you might ask, is this
happening? Afterall, a flyover of the British landscape shows it not that
much different to how it was 50 years ago. Yes, a small percentage of
farmland has been used for housing but nothing that would move the bird
population needle to the extent it has. Indeed, the amount of woodland has
actually increased and our coastline, bar some erosion, is immutable.
The clue to the answer lies in where
the bird population declines have happened most: upland bird species down
11%. Sea birds down 15%. Woodland birds down 32%. Farmland birds down 62%.
I have to sadly conclude, as I was once a staunch defender of farming, that
it is due to the agricultural methods of production. Insecticides,
pesticides, animal and bird husbandry and cropping regimes are the
culprits. It can be no coincidence that where farming happens least, the
uplands are low intensity at worst, the problem is least.
Einstein never actually said,
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and
expecting different results." but the truth of the quote still stands.
If we want to save our native birds, we need to take a scythe to current farming
practices.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment