Back in March the Bank of England announced that the human historical figures on the current banknotes were to be replaced with British wildlife and appointed a panel of six to draw up a shortlist from which we, the great British public, would have a say as to which made it on the £5, £10, £20 and £50 notes. As ever with these public ‘consultations’ I smell a stitch up.
You will see from the list that only two fish made the list of eighteen. I applaud the inclusion of the Atlantic salmon but the basking shark? Of course, as the world’s second largest fish, it is an impressive creature, but it is only a distant visitor to our shores and has no historical back story relating to England. Where are the herring or cod for instance? Both these have had economic and cultural significance dating back centuries.
As for the mammals, I thought the water based bluenose dolphin and grey seal a bit of a stretch for the category and consider the otter far more worthy of inclusion and I am sure you can think of others. The bird category seems to suggest the panel were simply trying to be different, or maybe obtuse, in that not a single one of the six they chose features in the top ten list of the most populous British birds. To my mind, the tiny wren which tops that population list, should have been a shoo in. |
No comments:
Post a Comment